The candidates for open steward positions at the various MATC campuses have written statements of intent and introduction so we can get to know them a little better. Click the pics below to enlarge and read each statement:
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Monday, November 1, 2010
Temporary Injunction Issued Against MATC in Unfair Labor Lawsuit
The following letter was issued late last week by the P/t Union regarding our ongoing legal struggle with the MATC administration. Click the image to enlarge.
Labels:
Juan Colas,
Labor,
Legal Action,
MATC,
P/T Union
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Ensuring that Students are Aware of Our Plight
MATC's Clarion presents the facts of our pending lawsuit.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Yet They Want the Taxpayers to Believe They Can't Afford Us...
The Wisconsin State Journal reports that:
The Madison Area Technical College district board voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a resolution of intent to borrow up to $150 million for a building expansion.Where exactly do the administration's priorities lie?
The resolution is a legally mandated first step toward putting the question to voters as a referendum on the November ballot. The college will have a public hearing about the resolution Sept. 8, and the board will subsequently decide whether the referendum will appear on the ballot.
The money would fund the first phase of the college's facilities master plan, which includes a new health building, the creation of a southern or western campus and an expansion of current facilities.
Under state law, technical colleges must hold referendums before completing any capital project that costs more than $1.5 million.
Monday, August 16, 2010
More P/t Union Media Mentions
- The On Campus blog picked us up.
- WisPolitics gives us a shout.
- The Campus Connection blog continues to offer support.
Labels:
Blog,
Campus Connection,
Lawsuit,
MATC,
On Campus,
WisPolitics
Friday, August 13, 2010
Inside Higher Ed Questions Who Gets Bumped?
Inside Higher Ed tackles the full-time vs. part-time debate head on in this article.
They get opinions from other part-time teachers groups:
They get opinions from other part-time teachers groups:
Keith Hoeller, co-founder of the Washington State Part-Time Faculty Association, who has worked on the issue of adjuncts' rights to class sections, said that "one of the most common and corrupt practices" in higher education today "is letting the tenure-stream faculty teach overloads, while refusing to let the part-time faculty teach even up to full time." He said that "this regressive practice prevents adjuncts from ever qualifying for tenure, and robs them of money and benefits."And an honest look at the heart of the division:
The split at Madison reflects one of the most challenging issues facing faculty leaders who are worried about an erosion of tenure-track, full-time jobs -- namely how to reverse the erosion without taking away the jobs on which adjuncts rely.
"The only resolution to this dilemma, to the contradiction of interests, is giving part-timers a predictable path into the full-time cohort," but since that's not happening due to the economy, "we're going to see more" conflicts like the one playing out in Madison, said Richard Boris, director of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, at the City University of New York’s Hunter College.Take time to view the comments section and add your own.
Wisconsin State Journal's Lawsuit Coverage
This recent article in the Wisconsin State Journal sheds a lot of light on how the MATC administration and full-time faculty view part-timers:
How is it better for students to be led by an overworked teacher? How is it better that an equally qualified educator is locked out of the system for merely not having the opportunity to work full-time? This singular statement shows that we are viewed as less than adequate - we simply exist in their eyes to take up the slack and balance a budget that is teetering on the edge.
We have not only the legal high ground in this situation, but the moral and ethical as well. It is simply wrong to disrespect and mistreat your supposed colleagues, full time union. Shame on you.
But college officials say that the new system ensures that more courses will be taught by full-time teachers, which they say is better for students.
How is it better for students to be led by an overworked teacher? How is it better that an equally qualified educator is locked out of the system for merely not having the opportunity to work full-time? This singular statement shows that we are viewed as less than adequate - we simply exist in their eyes to take up the slack and balance a budget that is teetering on the edge.
Part-time faculty currently teach more than 25 percent of courses, said Joe Lowndes, president of the full-time union.
"It's our long-standing position that full-time faculty are the best for the institution," Lowndes said.
We have not only the legal high ground in this situation, but the moral and ethical as well. It is simply wrong to disrespect and mistreat your supposed colleagues, full time union. Shame on you.
Labels:
Full-time Faculty,
Lawsuit,
Wisconsin State Journal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)